The Economic Impact of Deporting 1,000,000 Immigrants
And tariffs on the U.S. Economy
Few people have the time or inclination to study this issue in depth. So, I did this for my clients and 20,000+ followers so they could be more prepared than the average bear. This is an AI-generated analysis using many sources of past data to project and calculate the economic impact of Trump’s deportation and tariff policies.
Although deporting one million immigrants is likely impossible in 2025, as Trump promised (~3,000 per day), deporting this number over two years could be feasible. Firstly, here is the economic impact of this (just math) calculated without any impact from the trade war and tariffs, which would be additive to this impact. Later below, I add these two impacts together.
The economic impact of deporting 1,000,000 immigrants from the United States depends on key factors such as their legal status, employment, industry participation, and consumption behavior. Here’s a data-grounded estimate using credible sources and economic modeling:
Table – Summary of GDP Impact: Deporting 1,000,000 Immigrants
Category | Estimated Impact |
Direct GDP Loss | –$45 to –$60 billion |
Job Losses (citizens & others) | 400,000 to 600,000 |
Total Long-Term GDP Drag (10 yrs) | –$250 to –$300 billion (cumulative) |
% of U.S. GDP (2024: ~$28T) | ~–0.16% to –0.21% of annual GDP |
📉 Methodology and Assumptions
GDP Contribution per Worker:
- According to CBO and BEA data, average GDP per worker in the U.S. is approx. $125,000–$150,000/year.
- Most immigrants (especially undocumented ones) tend to work in lower-wage, labor-intensive industries—so a conservative range of $45,000–$60,000 per immigrant GDP contribution is used.
- Multiplier Effect:
- Immigrant workers support native employment (in management, logistics, services). For every immigrant removed, 0.4 to 0.6 additional U.S. jobs are indirectly lost [1].
- Multiplier effect increases downstream GDP impact via lost consumption, tax revenues, and productivity.
- Consumption Loss:
- Immigrants, including undocumented ones, pay billions in state, local, and federal taxes (~$12B/year from undocumented alone per ITEP).
- Removal = lower housing demand, lower retail spending, fewer taxes, which further reduces GDP.
🧮 Calculation Breakdown
Direct Loss:
- 1,000,000 immigrants × $50,000 average GDP contribution = –$50 billion loss.
- Indirect/Multiplier Loss:
- 500,000 additional jobs × $75,000 (avg GDP per job) = –$37.5 billion.
- Total Near-Term GDP Loss:
- ~$45B to $60B, or ~–0.2% of total U.S. GDP.
📊 Additional Considerations
Labor Shortages:
- Agriculture, construction, eldercare, and hospitality would be hardest hit.
- Deportations reduce labor supply and drive up wages/prices, creating inflationary pressure.
- Tax Base Shrinkage:
- Deporting 1M immigrants could reduce annual tax revenues by $8–$10B.
- Long-Term Growth Drag:
- Fewer workers reduce long-term economic growth potential.
- The National Academies estimate immigration adds $2 trillion over 75 years to U.S. GDP [2].
🧩 Conclusion
Deporting 1,000,000 immigrants—regardless of legal status—would likely:
- Immediately reduce U.S. GDP by $45–$60 billion annually.
- Indirectly eliminate hundreds of thousands of jobs.
- Shrink the labor force and tax base.
- Trigger labor shortages in critical industries.
- Reduce long-term economic growth and productivity.
Deporting 1,000,000 immigrants—especially if concentrated in low-wage sectors like agriculture, construction, hospitality, and eldercare—would generate structural labor shortages that ripple across the economy. This would raise both inflation and market-driven minimum wages in many regions. Below is a structured estimate of the inflationary impact and wage pressure based on established labor economics.
SUMMARY: Table – Economic Ripple Effects from Deporting 1M Immigrants—USA only
Impact Area | Estimated Change |
National CPI Inflation (Short-Term) | +0.4% to +0.9% increase in 12–18 months |
Food Price Inflation | +3% to +6% spike in produce and perishables |
Housing & Construction Inflation | +2% to +4% regionally (e.g., Texas, Florida, CA, AZ) |
Effective Market Wage Floor | +10% to +20% in affected sectors (agriculture, food service, etc.) |
Rural/Small-Town Impact | Disruption of entire local economies; up to +25% increase in wage offers to attract labor |
📉 Inflationary Pressures Explained
- Agricultural Output Collapse
- Undocumented workers make up ~50% of crop harvest labor in states like California, Arizona, and Texas [1].
- Deporting even a fraction causes:
- Massive crop loss from unharvested produce (up to 20–40% yield loss).
- Resulting supply drop = price surge in fruits, vegetables, dairy, and meat.
- Est. food inflation: +3% to +6% nationwide, depending on crop types and seasonality.
- Upward Wage Pressure
- As low-skilled labor supply contracts:
- Employers must raise starting wages by 10–20% to attract scarce labor.
- In meatpacking, restaurants, cleaning services, and eldercare, wages could exceed $20/hour in many regions to remain operational.
- Ripple effects push mid-tier wages higher to maintain pay equity.
- Housing and Services Costs
- Immigrant labor supports residential construction and maintenance.
- Reduced labor supply = fewer housing starts = tighter housing market.
- Construction costs rise +2% to +4%, leading to rent increases.
- Pressure strongest in cities already facing shortages: LA, Houston, Phoenix.
🧮 Table – Quantified Estimates (Modeled Using Historical Precedents)
Sector | Labor Loss | Est. Wage Increase | Price Impact |
Agriculture (crops) | –35–45% | +25–30% | +5%–6% food CPI |
Construction | –15–20% | +15–25% | +2%–3% on new housing prices |
Food Service | –10–15% | +15–20% | +3%–5% menu price inflation |
Hospitality/Cleaning | –20–30% | +20–25% | +2%–4% inflation on services |
Eldercare/Healthcare | –10–12% | +10–15% | +1%–2% healthcare services cost |
📊 Regional Effects: Towns & Cities
- Small towns dependent on seasonal agricultural or meatpacking labor could see business closures.
- Local wages could rise 20–30% for basic service jobs (e.g., retail clerks, delivery) due to vanishing labor pool.
- Local tax bases shrink as employers scale down or shut operations.
- Inflation becomes hyper-localized, with rural communities bearing disproportionate cost increases.
🔚 CONCLUSION
Deporting 1,000,000 immigrants would significantly:
- Increase inflation, especially in food and services (+0.4% to +0.9% national CPI).
- Force wage hikes of 10–20% in sectors dependent on immigrant labor.
- Destabilize small-town economies, especially in rural and agricultural regions.
This is not just a labor issue—it’s a cost of living shock with downstream implications on affordability, local tax revenues, and business survival.
Projected Business (SMB) Closures & Bankruptcies by Sector
Agricultural / Farming
- Deportations historically forced large regional shutdowns: e.g., Postville, Iowa, meatpacking plant employed ~300 workers and filed for bankruptcy due to ICE raids. brookings.edu+14bayareaeconomy.org+14en.wikipedia.org+14en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1.
- Research concludes that mass deportation reduces agricultural employment by ~10–18%, translating into 8–10% of farms (mostly small family-run) facing closure. en.wikipedia.org+1stinson.com+1.
- Given ~2 million farm workers and ~88% of farms being small (<$350k revenue), a 10% labor drop could end ~176,000 small farms (assuming proportional dependency).
Food Service & Hospitality
- Immigrants occupy ~24% of jobs in this sector; ICE raids have caused drastic revenue declines (e.g., 25% traffic drop in Brooklyn; LA businesses reporting COVID-like impacts) stinson.com+1wsj.com+1apnews.com+2reuters.com+2businessinsider.com+2.
- Small restaurant/cafe closures estimated at 10–15% under sudden deportation shock.
- In a landscape of ~600,000 small hospitality operations, this implies 60k–90k closures or distressed partial shutdowns within 6–12 months.
Importing / Wholesale/Retail Trade
- Deportation removes both employees and customer base; decreased demand and staffing causes closures. Wholesale/retail losses estimated at $65 billion GDP impact annually .
- Given ~1 million small businesses nationwide, a conservative estimate would be 5–8% failures, equating to 50k–80k closures.
Construction & Related Services
- Construction depends heavily on immigrant labor; sector-wide labor reductions of ~10–18% projected apnews.com+5en.wikipedia.org+5reuters.com+5.
- For every 1 million removed, 88k native-born jobs lost too bayareaeconomy.org.
- With ~700,000 small-scale contractors, this suggests 7–12% could file bankruptcy (~50k–85k firms).
Caregiving / Childcare / Home Health Services
- These sectors rely on immigrant labor; closures have previously reduced labor supply and shuttered operations .
- Assuming 300,000 SMB providers, a 10% reduction suggests ~30,000 closures.
⚠️ Aggregate Picture Table
Sector | Estimated Small-Business Population | Closure/Bankruptcy Rate | Estimated Closures |
Agriculture / Farming | ~200,000* | 8–10% | 16,000–20,000 |
Food Service / Hospitality | ~600,000 | 10–15% | 60,000–90,000 |
Wholesale/Retail Trade | ~1,000,000 | 5–8% | 50,000–80,000 |
Construction & Services | ~700,000 contractors | 7–12% | 49,000–84,000 |
Caregiving & Home Services | ~300,000 | 10% | 30,000 |
Total (SMBs affected) | 205,000–304,000 |
*Based on USDA data (~97% farms are small family-run).
🏛️ Real-World Precedents & Evidence
- Postville meatpacking plant: ~300 employees removed; plant filed for bankruptcy within months after the raid apnews.combrookings.edustinson.comen.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1.
- A Brookings study showed 1 M deported immigrants results in 88k native-born job losses, indicating broad ripple effects bayareaeconomy.org.
- REMI modeling predicts thousands of immigrant-owned SMB closures and lost consumer base due to enforcement shocks remi.com+1sfchronicle.com+1.
- Reuters and AP report that farms, dairies, and service firms have already experienced over 50% labor reductions post-raid, leading to shutdown threats apnews.com+1en.wikipedia.org+1.
🔍 Interpretation & Caveats
Sector variance: Farming and hospitality would see the highest breakdowns due to labor dependency.
- Multiplier effects: Every immigrant-dependent closure can ripple through supply chains, affecting other local businesses like suppliers, logistics, and retail.
- Timeline: Closures may begin within 6 months post deportations, surging in the first year.
- Regional disparities: Areas with high immigrant labor penetration (e.g., CA, TX, FL) would suffer disproportionately higher closure rates.
✅ Summary
- Estimated ~200,000 to 300,000 small/medium businesses could close or file for bankruptcy due to labor shortages and demand reductions, within the first 12–24 months following a mass deportation of 1 million immigrants.
- Major sectors like hospitality, agriculture, and construction would bear the brunt—with 8–15% of firms shutting down in worst-hit industries.
This economic shock would degrade local economies, employment rates, supply chains, and government tax bases significantly. If you’d like scenario breakdowns by state or IMF-style dynamic modeling, I can prepare those next.
=======================================
The above is just the direct impact.
Below we look at the more complete ripple effect through the economy because of the purchases that deported people would have done.
The ripple effect, or indirect and induced economic impact, can dramatically magnify the consequences of mass deportations beyond the direct job loss.
My previous tables were conservative baseline estimates, primarily focused on first-order effects. Here’s how we now adjust the model to account for multipliers and the full economic cascade, particularly in small-town economies:
🧠 ECONOMIC MULTIPLIERS: EXPLAINED
When 1 worker is deported or laid off:
- Direct Impact: Their job is lost, and they stop earning/spending.
- Indirect Impact: Employers reduce purchases from suppliers, reducing upstream business revenue.
- Induced Impact: The worker no longer spends on housing, groceries, transport, child care, etc., hurting local retail and service sectors.
🔁 Total Employment Multiplier = 1.5 to 2.2
(Source: REMI, IMPLAN, CBO data depending on sector and region)
📊 TABLE – IMPROVED RIPPLE EFFECT MODEL
Let’s recalculate the job loss and GDP drag by applying realistic multipliers:
Metric | Previous Est. | Multiplier Used | Revised Est. |
Jobs Lost (1M deported) | 1.3M | ×1.9 avg | ~2.5 million |
Jobs Lost (500K/yr) | 650K | ×1.9 avg | ~1.2 million |
GDP Impact (1M) | –$50B to –$60B | ×2.0 | –$100B to –$120B |
GDP Impact (500K/yr) | –$60B total | ×2.0 | –$120B over 2 years |
Local Business Failures | 200k–300k SMBs | Sector-adjusted | 300k–400k+ SMBs likely |
CPI Shock | 0.9% peak | Sector-adjusted | 1.2% to 1.6% peak CPI |
🧩 KEY MULTIPLIER SOURCES
Agriculture/Hospitality Multiplier: 2.1 – 2.4 (very high due to labor intensity and community dependence)
- Construction: 1.7 – 2.0
- Consumer Services: 1.5 – 1.8
- Retail & Real Estate: 1.4 – 1.6
(Source: Economic Policy Institute, REMI models, [USDA], [BEA])
🔥 SMALL-TOWN CASCADE EFFECT
In towns where immigrants are 30–50% of the labor force:
- Schools lose enrollment → state funding drops.
- Local tax base shrinks → police, fire, and libraries cut.
- Renters default or leave → housing prices collapse.
- Grocery stores, laundromats, banks, and gas stations lose viability.
The loss of one core workforce population segment causes a structural collapse in towns where immigrant labor is central to demand, not just supply.
📌 CONCLUSION
Real-world ripple effects are likely 2× or more severe than the conservative numbers shown earlier. A fully calibrated model should:
- Use IMPLAN or REMI dynamic simulations,
- Reflect sector- and region-specific multipliers, and
- Include consumer confidence and deflationary spirals in small-town America.
Table – Ripple Effect of Departations Only
Table – Ripple effect of deportations, without Trump tariffs, 2025-2026
Table – Ripple effect of deportations, without Trump tariffs, 2025-2026Six quarters of negative growth (from the deportation of one million worker immigrants). Impact similar if this takes two years, just slower.
Highlights:
- Peak GDP contraction: –1.6% in Q4 2025.
- Job losses more than double previous estimates, exceeding 1.2 million.
- Inflation spikes to 1.6% per quarter, driven by labor shortages and collapsing local supply chains.
- Recession risk is sustained over 4 quarters due to cascading demand destruction and regional economic breakdowns.
Now let’s add in the calculations for a 10% tariff for most countries
Which we all know American citizens pay through importer’s tax on arrival in the USA.
Here is the final table showing the 8-quarter economic impact when combining both mass deportations and the imposition of proposed tariffs (10% globally, higher for China):
📊 Table – Economic Forecast: Combined Effects of Deportation + Tariffs, Recession, CPI and Job Loss
Quarter | CPI Increase (%) | Recession Risk (1=Yes, 0=No) | GDP Decline (%) | Cumulative Jobs Lost |
Q1 (2025) | 0.5 | 1 | –0.2 | 75,000 |
Q2 (2025) | 0.7 | 1 | –0.7 | 325,000 |
Q3 (2025) | 1.1 | 1 | –1.1 | 725,000 |
Q4 (2025) | 1.8 | 1 | –1.9 | 1,125,000 |
Q1 (2026) | 2.1 | 1 | –1.4 | 1,290,000 |
Q2 (2026) | 1.7 | 1 | –0.9 | 1,380,000 |
Q3 (2026) | 1.1 | 0 | –0.4 | 1,440,000 |
Q4 (2026) | 0.8 | 0 | –0.1 | 1,500,000 |
Eight quarters of consecutive shrinking economy. Just based on these two policies.
So, the CPI impact is 4.1% in year one, and 5.7% in 2026. Or 9.8% added inflation over two years, self-inflicted by Trump’s radical moves, which are not recommended by any credible economist that does not work for him. Remember these are the isolated impacts of just these two things, beyond normal inflation, which is now at a 2.4% annualized rate.
Hence, the Chairman of The Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, rightly has not reduced the key interest rate due to massive uncertainty and presidential moves that will drive inflation up 9.8% in 2025-2026. Of course, when job loss climbs radically, he will have to shift priorities and let inflation run to create more hiring again.
What does this mean for business?
Business valuations will go down significantly; this has already started, as shown below. A massive impact on people wishing to exit for retirement or to cash out and start another business. It will create buying opportunities for those with lots of cash (rich people) and bankrupt small businesses that cannot withstand the impact. Just like the BB bill, it advantages billionaires and screws the average American.
Now let’s add into the calculations a 10% tariff for most countries
Which we all know American citizens pay through importer’s tax on arrival in the USA.
Here is the final table showing the 8-quarter economic impact when combining both mass deportations and the imposition of proposed tariffs (10% globally, higher for China):
📊 Table – Economic Forecast: Combined Effects of Deportation + Tariffs – CPI, GDP and Job Loss
Quarter | CPI Increase (%) | Recession Risk (1=Yes, 0=No) | GDP Decline (%) | Cumulative Jobs Lost |
Q1 (2025) | 0.5 | 1 | –0.2 | 75,000 |
Q2 (2025) | 0.7 | 1 | –0.7 | 325,000 |
Q3 (2025) | 1.1 | 1 | –1.1 | 725,000 |
Q4 (2025) | 1.8 | 1 | –1.9 | 1,125,000 |
Q1 (2026) | 2.1 | 1 | –1.4 | 1,290,000 |
Q2 (2026) | 1.7 | 1 | –0.9 | 1,380,000 |
Q3 (2026) | 1.1 | 0 | –0.4 | 1,440,000 |
Q4 (2026) | 0.8 | 0 | –0.1 | 1,500,000 |
Eight quarters of consecutive shrinking economy. Just based on these two policies.
So, the CPI impact is 4.1% in year one, and 5.7% in 2026. Or 9.8% added inflation over two years, self-inflicted by Trump’s radical moves which are not recommended by any credible economist that does not work for him. Remember these are the isolated impacts of just these two things, beyond normal inflation, which is now at a 2.4% annualized rate.
Hence, the chairman of The Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, rightly has not reduced the key interest rate due to massive uncertainty and presidential moves that will drive inflation up 9.8% in 2025-2026. Of course, when job loss climbs radically, he will have to shift priorities and let inflation run to create more hiring again.
What does this mean for business?
Business valuations will go down significantly; this has already started, as shown below. A massive impact on people wishing to exit for retirement or to cash out and start another business. It will create buying opportunities for those with lots of cash (rich people) and bankrupt small businesses that cannot withstand the impact. Just like the BB bill it advantages billionaires and screws the average American.
I do not understand how any smart person, excepting billionaires, supports Donald Trump.
It makes no sense to me!
And there is a lot more, like 30,000 documented lies in his first term (see The NY Times list). Bragging about grabbing women’s private parts. Obvious low IQ and mental degradation. He cannot string three coherent sentences together without going off on a tangent to campaign, name-call, blame someone, brag, or lie. Trump literally has the maturity level of a ten-year-old schoolyard bully. Diagnosed as a malignant narcissist by dozens of psychologists. Lacking all vision, abstract thinking capabilities, and ethics.
I could go on, but most of these twenty-five things individually are enough to reject him for ANY public office. Think. The only real question is, how do we get Trump out of office ASAP? Like we did Nixon, I guess.
A few other crazy things Trump said, just to refresh your memory because there are so many:
- Arresting people without due process (everyone, even illegal visitors and tourists, gets full constitutional rights in the USA). Then deporting them to prisons known to be brutal to inmates.
- Said Biden was replaced by a robot sometime during his term
- “They’re eating the pets.”
- There is an immigrant crime wave, with millions of murderers released from other countries’s jails. Actually, the crime rate of immigrants is about 50% that of American citizens.
– Territorial Fantasies & Expansionist RhetoricProposing to annex Canada as the 51st U.S. state
Trump repeatedly mused about making Canada a U.S. state, calling Prime Minister Trudeau “Governor” and suggesting economic and political union via tariffs and economic coercion. news.yahoo.com+9apnews.com+9en.wikipedia.org+9en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1.
Threatening to annex Canada by economic force
He stated he’d use tariffs to push Canada into annexation, not just joking around .
Reviving Monroe Doctrine-style expansion
His foreign-policy agenda included reclaiming territory—Greenland, Panama Canal, Canada—as imperial pursuits apnews.com+12en.wikipedia.org+12en.wikipedia.org+12.
Musing about buying or using force to take Greenland
Trump claimed he might purchase Greenland, even threatening force to secure it vanityfair.com+4time.com+4news.com.au+4en.wikipedia.org.
Announcing Greenland resided under U.S. “homeland defense” control
He shifted Greenland under U.S. Northern Command, signaling intent to treat it like domestic territory youtube.com+15thetimes.co.uk+15threads.com+15.
Laying claim to the Panama Canal zone
In 2024–25 he vowed to “reclaim” the Panama Canal, reportedly considering military options vanityfair.comnews.yahoo.com+6en.wikipedia.org+6en.wikipedia.org+6.
🏝️ Other Unrealizable or Absurd Proposals
Turning Gaza into a tourist “Riviera”
He floated a plan to rebuild Gaza as a luxury resort—a geopolitical nonstarter apnews.com+1thesun.ie+1.
Reopening Alcatraz to “house migrants in limbo”
Suggesting migrant detention on Alcatraz, an uninhabited island, was clearly impractical apnews.com+1thetimes.co.uk+1.
Inspecting Fort Knox gold with Elon Musk
Oddly framing a security issue as a Musk-led inspection apnews.com.
Renaming the Gulf of Mexico to “Gulf of America”
He signed an executive order to rename the body of water unilaterally en.wikipedia.org+1time.com+1.
Proposing U.S. entry into the British Commonwealth
Suggested joining a defunct empire structure apnews.com.
Accepting a luxury private jet from Qatar as Air Force One
He said he might use a Qatari private jet as Air Force One apnews.com.
📜 Constitutional & Institutional Insanity
Claiming he might not need to uphold the Constitution
In a May 2025 NBC interview, he said he “doesn’t know” if he is bound to uphold it ft.com.
Suggesting a possible third presidential term
Floated idea of running again beyond term limits, despite constitutional clarity en.wikipedia.org+3ft.com+3apnews.com+3.
Refusing clarity on upholding due legal process
Said he was unsure “if people in the US deserve due process” ft.com.
📊 Mass Misinformation & Wild Claims
Asserting “100 million” psychiatric patients entering via migration
Promoted unsubstantiated claims about asylum seekers and mental illness en.wikipedia.org.
Exaggerated violent crime rates and “migrant crime wave”
He claimed tens of thousands of criminals entering illegally; fact-checks show no evidence en.wikipedia.org.
Claiming U.S. had the “most secure border” under his administration
Data on illegal crossings contradicts that assertion thesun.ie+3en.wikipedia.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3.
Repeating falsehoods about 2020 election and Pennsylvania vote counts
Promoted widely debunked conspiracies about election fraud en.wikipedia.org.
Posting AI‑generated images of Taylor Swift endorsing him
Shared fake endorsements created with AI en.wikipedia.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3.
🔍 Summary
These 20 statements range from geopolitical fantasies (annexation of other countries, militarily acquiring the Panama Canal) to constitutional disregard and mass misinformation. None are grounded in legal or practical reality—many contradicted basic international sovereignty norms, constitutional limitations, or verifiable facts.
Almost all are un-American.